Legislature(2009 - 2010)
2009-04-17 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2009-04-17 Senate Journal Page 1024 HB 177 CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 177(L&C) "An Act relating to marine products and motorized recreational products; and providing for an effective date" was read the second time. 2009-04-17 Senate Journal Page 1025 Senator Paskvan, Chair, moved and asked unanimous consent for the adoption of the Labor and Commerce Senate Committee Substitute offered on page 1018. Without objection, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 177(L&C) "An Act relating to marine products and motorized recreational products; amending Rule 3, Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure; and providing for an effective date" (technical title change) was adopted. Senator Ellis moved and asked unanimous consent that the bill be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Without objection, it was so ordered. SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 177(L&C) was read the third time. Senators McGuire, Meyer, Paskvan, Wielechowski, Menard, Bunde, Therriault, Thomas, Wagoner, Dyson, French, Stevens, Stedman, Huggins moved and asked unanimous consent to be shown as cross sponsors on the bill. Without objection, it was so ordered. The question being: "Shall SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 177(L&C) "An Act relating to marine products and motorized recreational products; amending Rule 3, Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 177(L&C) Third Reading - Final Passage Effective Date Court Rule Change YEAS: 19 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 VACANT: 1 Yeas: Bunde, Davis, Dyson, Ellis, French, Hoffman, Huggins, Kookesh, McGuire, Menard, Meyer, Olson, Paskvan, Stedman, Stevens, Therriault, Thomas, Wagoner, Wielechowski and so, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 177(L&C) passed the Senate. Senator Ellis moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clause. Without objection, it was so ordered. 2009-04-17 Senate Journal Page 1026 Senator Ellis moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the Court Rule change. Without objection, it was so ordered and the bill was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.